Tuesday, April 22, 2014

Why Should I Question the Age of the Earth? Pt. 2 They Just Don't Mix

In the previous blog post we introduced the topic of Why Should I Question the Age of the Earth? by looking at a basic overview of the mainstream scientific account and the Biblical account of the age of the earth.

Here is a summary of the two sides:



In comparing the Bible and mainstream science we can see an astounding difference:

  4,550,000,000 years
-               6,000 years
-----------------------------
  4,549,994,000 years 

That’s a difference of 4,549,994,000 years!

However, it is becoming more and more common for Christians to begin accepting mainstream science's teaching of an old earth as truth. And in doing so, they begin to compromise God's Word in order to make the Bible fit mainstream science. 

I believe this poses a great threat to the integrity of Christ's Church. We can NOT compromise God's Word to fit the thoughts and ideas of man as shown here:

Colossians 2:8 Beware lest any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit, after the tradition of men, after the rudiments of the world, and not after Christ. (KJV)

We are warned by God here not to allow the philosophy or vain deceit of man fool us into compromising God's Word.

So then the question becomes:

Is believing in mainstream science's theory of an old earth a compromise of God's Word?

In order to answer this question let's look at the most popular theory that attempts to merge the Bible with mainstream science:

The Gap Theory

The most popular theory that many Christians buy into concerning the merging of these two ideas is called The Gap Theory

In an effort to combine the theories of an old earth and the Biblical creation Thomas Chalmers (1780-1847) and later many other scholars helped popularize the idea of the Gap Theory. 

(Thomas Chalmers)
Retrieved from britannica.com

The basic idea of the Gap Theory is that billions of years went by between the first two verses of the Bible:

Genesis 1:1-2 In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth. 2 And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters. (KJV)

So basically God created the heaven and the earth and then allowed billions of years to pass (in which macro-evolution occurred) and billions of years later God finalized his creation starting in Genesis 1:2.

(The Gap Theory)
Retrieved from Dr. Kent's Creation Seminars at wiseoldgoat.com

This theory can be found in an excerpt from Dake’s Annotated Reference Bible:

When men finally agree on the age of the earth, then place the many years.. between Genesis 1:1 and Genesis 1:2, there will be no conflict between the Book of Genesis and science.

-Dake’s Annotated Reference Bible

Thus, with the addition of these billions of years between these two verses we have the Bible and mainstream science in complete agreement.

So the Gap Theory sounds pretty legitimate, right?

Here are three reasons why I believe the Gap Theory and any other related theory is a direct compromise of God's Word:

1. Six Literal Days

The Bible teaches that ALL things were created in six literal days.

Exodus 20:11 For in six days the LORD made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that in them is, and rested the seventh day: wherefore the LORD blessed the sabbath day, and hallowed it. (KJV)

The Gap Theory states that God created the heaven and the earth, and then billions of years later (through evolution) God finalized the sea and creatures and mankind. But that's not what Exodus 20:11 says! Exodus 20:11 states that the heaven, the earth, the sea and ALL things within them were created in just six days! Thus, the Gap Theory is a direct contradiction of God's Word.

Some then may argue that the word 'day' (or 'yom' in Hebrew) in Genesis or Exodus could be translated to mean thousands or millions of years. This is sometimes referred to as the Day-Age theory. Is this theory legitimate?

Throughout the Old Testament the word ‘day’ (or 'yom' in Hebrew) is used over 200 times and is always translated to mean a literal 24 hour day. This is further evident in Genesis 1 when God uses the phrase ‘evening and the morning’ to describe the word ‘day’. Thus the word ‘day’ here must be taken in its most literal sense.

Genesis 1:5 And God called the light Day, and the darkness he called Night. And the evening and the morning were the first day. (KJV)

For a more comprehensive study on the Day-Age theory check out this article: http://www.icr.org/article/theistic-evolution-day-age-theory/

2. The Death Problem

The Bible clearly states that when Adam (from Adam and Eve) sinned he brought sin and death into this world. This is stated in Romans 5 here:

Romans 5:12 Wherefore, as by one man sin entered into the world, and death by sin; and so death passed upon all men, for that all have sinned: (KJV)

Therefore, if Adam brought death into the world we can infer that death was not present before Adam sinned.

However, if we follow the Gap Theory, we agree to the idea that evolution occurred during this 'Gap' period and thus creatures lived and died over millions of years during this 'Gap'. 

(The Death Problem)
Retrieved from answersingenesis.org

But how could Adam have brought death into this world if the Gap Theory implies that death had already been around for millions of years?

Perhaps the creatures of the Gap Theory never died, but they were millions of years old at the time of Adam and Eve?

I don't buy it. You see, trying to compromise the literal meaning of Genesis leads to conflict and illogical conclusions.

3. Jesus Taught a Young Earth

Perhaps the most compelling argument is that Jesus believed and taught a short creation. In Mark 10:6 Jesus states:

Mark 10:6 But from the beginning of the creation God made them male and female. (KJV)

Jesus states that God created man and woman ‘from the beginning of creation’. The Gap Theory states that man and woman had not come into existence until billions of years after the initial creation. 

Do you really think when Jesus stated that God created man and woman ‘from the beginning of creation’, that he meant 14 billion years after the creation? 

That is what the Gap Theory teaches.

Conclusion:

If you choose to believe in mainstream science's theory of an old earth, I feel it is evident that you are in direct contradiction with Jesus' teachings and God's Word itself.

I cannot stress enough the danger of compromising God's Word based on the ideas and teachings of man. Mankind and mainstream science have been wrong countless times before in the history of this world, but the Bible has always been proven true.

So it all comes down to who or what you are willing to trust:

Will you trust the all-knowing God or will you trust the teachings and ideas of man?

I invite you to have an open heart and open mind in studying this topic. My intent is not to put down the beliefs and opinions of others, but instead to promote and spread the truth of God's Word.

In the next few posts I will look at flaws within the mainstream scientific theory of an old earth, and why this theory may not be as valid as you think.

Sincerely,

Jacob Springer
A Young Christian

6 comments:

  1. Wooooowwwww, care to explain contradictions in the bible then?
    Heres a list to get you started:
    http://infidels.org/library/modern/jim_meritt/bible-contradictions.html
    Not to mention that science has been proven wrong only because new evidence is brought to life, things are happening all the time in our universe that are absolutely incredible, but I seriously doubt are the work of some guy in the sky whos looking down and judging all of us. Not to mention, the bible wasn't even written until 300 years after the supposes jesus came and died. How do we know it wasn't just some story made up by the catholic church to get power, which at the time they were? Jesus could've been some crazy man with voices in his head, or not even have existed at all. Also, WE HAVE CARBON DATING. We know for a fact that the earth is much older than the 6,000 years you claim it to be. There are fossils of creatures much older than mankind, and even some evidence that evolution did occur in humans. One day in the distant future, christianity will be to the people of the future as greek gods are to us. Instead of "wow those guys were weird, thinking there were a bunch of gods controlling everything and having sex with eachother and humans on earth", it'll be "wow those guys were weird, thinking some guy in the sky was gonna judge them for *ohmygosh* being a normal human being and not being perfect"

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I welcome any and all opinions. However, I must also set a policy for only tasteful and professional discussion. I am not here to start arguments, but rather intelligent, thoughtful discussion.

      In response to your comment, I have heard of and studied many of these contradictions that critics of the Bible claim. I have even taken a class in which the professor's sole agenda was to disprove the Bible's validity. Throughout most all of these contradictions, I have been able to find a logical explanation and my faith has never wavered because of them.

      Scientific discoveries are always changing, but I believe the Bible is truth and never changes. I think it takes much more faith to be an atheist than to be a believer in a higher power.

      Concerning your comment of the Bible being written 300 years after Christ, I think you are referring to the commission of Constantine I in 331 AD in which some claim that Constantine and his council chose which books to be part of the Bible and perhaps even edited these books. For that comment I invite you to follow this link: http://considerthegospel.org/faqs/faq-constantine/

      Carbon dating and the fossil records are very good points you made. However, I have studied these topics as well and they will be the subject of my future blog posts so I invite you to read them.

      Finally, the Judeo-Christian religion has stood the test of time, and comparing it to the short-lived belief in Greek mythology, in my opinion, proves the point that there must be something valid about the Judeo-Christian God.

      Delete
  2. I like that you have the balls to write these blogs. Good on you for that. I consider myself a christian but definitely have doubts about the earth being only 6000 years old. What I would have loved to see here is more evidence from outside of the Bible. I'm sorry, but using a source to prove that that source is correct is a lot like using a word in its own definition.

    I actually believe in the Gap theory, though I never knew there was a term for it. I just kind of made observations for myself and noticed that the bible jumps time gaps a lot. For instance it might say something as vague as many years passed, or jump from "he was born" to "when he was an adult." With these gaps in time it's not hard to imagine that thousands of years or many generations may have been omitted in the history of the bible in order to move the story along. I know that makes it sound like a fictitious novel, but that's not what I'm getting at. What I am getting at is can you imagine if the Bible included thousands or billions of years of humans or human's ancestors where nothing significant happened. The Bible may have been extended by thousands of pages just to account the lineages of generations that played no significance over the history of man kinds history with God. Furthermore, without something like the gap theory, how do you explain kingdoms that pop up and seem to have no ties to Adam and Eve's lineage? I'm not saying it's perfect but I think the gap theory goes a long way towards explaining some of these anomalies.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Fair point about using sources. I do have more evidence from outside the Bible, I have just been saving it for future posts. But if you would like to research the evidence yourself, I've found these sites to be useful: http://www.icr.org/ and http://www.answersingenesis.org/ among others.

      Most gap theorists believe the gap to be in Genesis 1:1-2 which was the primary discussion of this blog post. But you make an interesting point about time gaps being elsewhere in the Bible. However, the Bible is very good about tracking genealogies from Adam even down to Christ. You can see some of this genealogy in Genesis 5 and Genesis 11. Genesis 5 starts with Adam and even provides ages of each generation. This is how we get an earth to be about 6000 years old and you can read more about that here: http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/2007/05/30/how-old-is-earth

      In terms of kingdoms popping up, there were countless kingdoms that arose from the lineage of Adam and Eve and ultimately Noah and his family. The genealogies recorded in the Bible only follow the line that goes from Adam through David and then down to Jesus. So all of the brothers, cousins, cousins' cousins, etc. which aren't mentioned in these genealogies went off to their own land and that's how so many other kingdoms arose.

      Delete
    2. hmm, still not convinced that there were no skipped time periods in the bible. It just seems like the logical thing to do in the instance of generations that wouldn't have played a large role and could explain the confusingly long lifespans of people, especially Adam and his earliest descendants. For instance instead meaning that Adam lived for 900+ years it could have meant that Adam's direct lineage played a significant role for a very long time. Much like we use names like Han to describe a dynasty or Tudor(or however you spell it) to describe a lineage of related monarchs. Perhaps Adam created a kingdom or tribe that lasted for what the writers could have perceived as 900+ years.. I'll admit I don't have time to look at those links right now but hopefully I will soon. Don't worry I'll be around and I look forward to reading your future blogs. Have a good evening, bro.
      -

      Delete
  3. Just a thought... In the bible, I may be wrong as I can't remember where, but it states that a day is but 1000 years to God. Could it have been that creation actually took 7000 years? That's my mindset on that part. I don't know if you've thought of it or not, just throwing out another opinion.

    My other opinion: calendars, relative to the time of man, have only recently been correct. For many years calendars were wrong. I believe there is a, I know this word is the wrong word to use so bear with me, translation hinge. People could have very well lived 600-ish years. But, what if, their calendars were shorter or longer than ours? What if a year to them was a month? What if a year to them was a decade?

    I would never think that the bible is wrong, even though it may seem as if j just contradicted myself. I just think that through the times, years may be off due to our interpretation/translation of them.

    I enjoyed this post, along with other posts, and wish you the best.

    ReplyDelete